hoveringsombrero: (Default)
[personal profile] hoveringsombrero
or something,
i clicked on that silly livejournal purity test thing in someone's journal (dunno which one, several people on my friend's list linked it) and i would have not posted here that i took it
except that NAKEDPARTS got mentioned in it, in the "sexolicious!" section questions 43-46
too funny

well here's my results:

You answered "yes" to 38 of 77 questions, making you 50.6% lj pure (49.4% lj corrupt); that is, you are 50.6% pure in the lj domain (you have 49.4% LiveJournal Freak in you).

Date: 2001-05-17 09:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] roshi.livejournal.com
you can blame me for that. i put the nakedparts thing in since lj seems to have this thing about nudity, and that was the best known journal/community/area related to that, that i knew of.

Date: 2001-05-17 09:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] eris.livejournal.com
=D
well it made my day

I don't really get their scaling ...

Date: 2001-05-17 11:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] btripp.livejournal.com
I got this ..
You answered "yes" to 35 of 77 questions, making you 54.5% lj pure (45.5% lj corrupt); that is, you are 54.5% pure in the lj domain (you have 45.5% LiveJournal Freak in you).

It seems to me that just COUNTING up the number of "yes" answers is a bit ham-handed on doing one of these things ... was there not weighting ... I mean, some of those questions were far more edgy than others!


Image (http://i.am/btripp)




Profile

hoveringsombrero: (Default)
hoveringsombrero

January 2015

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
2526 2728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 27th, 2026 01:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios